Discussion about this post

User's avatar
X.PIN's avatar

"In LLMs, the gap between Chinese and US companies has been real, shaped by the first-mover advantages that OpenAI and Anthropic built through years of foundational research, US export restrictions on advanced chips, and different friendliness to subscription-based services. Video generation is a different story. Chinese labs entered this race simultaneously with Western ones, and in some cases earlier."

It’s true. I mean Sora is just a tool. There’s no way for YouTube or Instagram to optimize a Sora-generated video. In fact, it’s usually the opposite. TikTok and Instagram often de-prioritize AI videos, and YouTube doesn’t actively promote them either. But Kling AI and Jimeng are backed by Kuaishou and ByteDance—of course, they can optimize the feed for AI-generated content within the algorithms on their platforms. So the ROI is huge.

And as for China’s looser IP environment, it does pose a significant challenge for artists, but it’s true that it helps AI startup companies progress significantly in a short amount of time, even posing a threat to their US counterparts. It really depends on the angle from which you look at things.

And we can't discuss AI video in China without bringing up verticals/short dramas. In fact, AI-generated videos have already become a major force in vertical production.

rosicky311's avatar

你还忘记了minimax的海螺

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?